Tagsight for maintenance planners
The CMMS is supposed to know about every instrument and every piece of rotating equipment in the plant. In practice it knows about the ones that broke. You schedule planned maintenance against a register that is partially populated and never matches the drawing pack.
Read one of your own drawings.
Drop a P&ID, instrument index, or schedule. Tagsight reads it to the tag and opens a workspace you keep when you sign in.
PDF · DWG · DXF · TIFF · PNG · XLSX
What you do today.
- Pull the equipment list off whatever P&ID revision the engineering team last issued
- Cross-walk against the CMMS register, flag the missing entries
- Open work orders to populate the gaps, wait on data entry
- Schedule planned maintenance against a register you only half trust
What changes with Tagsight.
- Run the controlled P&ID register through extraction, get a complete equipment and instrument list
- Compare against the CMMS export, surface the missing entries in one report
- Push the deltas to the data-load queue with source-page references for the technician
- Re-run quarterly so the register stops decaying between turnarounds
Where it fits in your week.
CMMS gap survey
Maintenance manager wants to know how many instruments in the plant are missing from Maximo. Run the current drawing register through Tagsight, diff against the CMMS export, report the gap by unit. The conversation with the asset information team starts from data, not anecdote.
Planned maintenance scope
Quarterly PM scope is built against the equipment list. Tagsight produces the up-to-date list off the latest controlled P&IDs, so the schedule aligns with what is actually in the plant.
Spare parts inventory cross-check
Storeroom holds spares against a register that drifted from the drawings. Pull the equipment list, compare against the storeroom catalog, surface the spares that no longer have an installed parent.
FAQ.
Does Tagsight write to my CMMS directly.
Tagsight produces structured exports in the column shapes Maximo, SAP PM, and other CMMS systems consume. The actual write happens through your existing data-load process. The source-page traceability in each row gives the data-entry technician a defensible reference.
What about non-instrumented equipment like manual valves.
Manual valves and other non-instrumented equipment are extracted when annotated on the P&ID. The equipment list is the structured snapshot of what the drawing says is installed. What the CMMS does with it is a downstream choice.