Tagsight for epc engineers
You win or lose on bid accuracy and on close-out cleanliness. The bid drawing set lands with two weeks' clock and your discipline team has to commit to an I/O count, an equipment count, a cable count, an instrument count - across four trades, off a drawing set you have never seen. The close-out package three years later is supposed to reconcile every one of those bid numbers against the as-built.
What you do today.
- Bid phase: scatter the drawing set across discipline leads, each counting their scope by hand under deadline
- Engineering phase: build per-discipline documents in per-discipline templates, reconcile at integration meetings
- Construction phase: track field changes per discipline, redline back to the master, re-issue affected documents
- Close-out: reconcile the as-built drawing set against four years of revision history and the bid baseline
What changes with Tagsight.
- Bid phase produces a structured count across all four trades from the bid drawing set; the bid number is defensible against source-page references
- Engineering phase per-discipline documents come off one workspace; the cross-discipline reconciliation is a built-in step, not a series of meetings
- Construction redlines extract back into the master register so the as-built documents track the redlines instead of trailing them
- Close-out package is a diff between the bid drawing set, the IFC set, and the as-built set - three revisions in one report instead of three years of forensic reconciliation
- Vendor package handover (rotating equipment, package skids, HVAC sub-vendors) extracts into the master register with parent-skid attribution so the boundary between EPC scope and vendor scope is data, not a memo
Where it fits in your week.
Bid-stage discipline count under deadline
RFP closes Friday with 320 drawing pages across P&ID, SLD, mechanical, HVAC. Run all four through extraction Tuesday morning, get the per-discipline count on Wednesday, lock the bid number Thursday with a defensible baseline.
Multi-vendor package boundary
Rotating equipment vendor, BAS controls vendor, MCC builder, and instrumentation packager each ship their own scope documents. Extract every vendor package, surface the scope boundaries against the master EPC register, ship a clean per-vendor receiving inspection list.
Close-out delta to the bid baseline
Owner asks for a close-out delta showing what changed from the bid commitment to the as-built. Diff the three revisions of every discipline package, hand the owner one report that ties every change back to the MOC that authorized it.
FAQ.
Does Tagsight integrate with the project documentation systems EPCs use (Aconex, SmartPlant Construction, ProjectWise)?
Tagsight exports plain Excel and structured JSON; both drop into Aconex, ProjectWise, and SmartPlant Construction unmodified. The MCP server and REST API allow custom integrations where the EPC's tooling needs a programmatic feed of the extraction results.
Can my discipline leads see only their own scope inside a shared workspace?
Workspace access controls scope visibility per discipline lead. The project-wide cross-reference still runs for the project engineer; each discipline lead sees their own slice.
Does this replace the systems-completion package the commissioning team produces?
No. Systems-completion (MC) and ready-for-startup (RFSU) packages are a separate engineering discipline. Tagsight produces the master register that the MC database joins against; the MC checklist itself stays in the commissioning tool.