Does Tagsight handle the mix of mining, oil and gas, and chemicals tagging conventions Fluor projects span.

Yes. ISA 5.1, NORSOK, KKS, AS 1100, operator in-house, and other regional or client variants all come through without per-project configuration.

Is Tagsight a Fluor-approved or registered vendor.

Tagsight is independent. This page describes how Tagsight serves engineers working at Fluor on EPC projects. It does not represent a partnership, approval, or vendor-registration status with Fluor.

Can Tagsight produce the I/O list, instrument index, and related documents for a 200-page refinery turnaround scope.

Yes. Drawing sets up to several hundred pages process page-by-page. The structured controls dataset includes I/O list, instrument index, equipment list, and line list, with revision comparison if the prior as-built is also uploaded.

Does Tagsight handle scanned legacy drawings on brownfield revamp scope.

Yes. Scanned PDFs and image uploads, PNG, JPG, TIFF are supported. The cleaner the scan, the less you confirm by hand. On a degraded scan you review and adjust more rows in the canvas before export.

Fluor.

Instrument density, pipe-spec labelling, and tag format shift with every Fluor client and sector. The document structure underneath stays constant across mining, petrochemicals, and advanced facilities.

Start a workspace See industries served

Primary standard: Client-driven plus Fluor internal practice

Project I/O list against the client-specified tagging convention
Master instrument index with tag uniqueness across the full project drawing set
Equipment list keyed to vessels, pumps, compressors, and packaged skids
Line list per the client line-numbering family
Valve list with fail position and actuator type for the EI&T scope
SIS register per IEC 61511 separated from BPCS
Revision comparison reports for IFC-to-IFD-to-AFC progression

Operator-specific tagging conventions come through alongside ISA 5.1
Multi-page drawing sets process page-by-page so review starts on early pages while later pages are still processing
BPCS, SIS, FGS segmentation onto distinct Excel sheets
Revision comparison produces the IFC-to-AFC change records project document control needs
Direct exports to TIA Portal, Studio 5000, PLCCreator, DEXPI
Image-based ingestion covers brownfield revamp scope where prior as-builts are scanned

Start a workspace Pricing

Fluor is referenced descriptively. Tagsight has no affiliation with Fluor Corporation.

Fluor.

Start a workspace See industries served

Primary standard: Client-driven plus Fluor internal practice

Project I/O list against the client-specified tagging convention
Master instrument index with tag uniqueness across the full project drawing set
Equipment list keyed to vessels, pumps, compressors, and packaged skids
Line list per the client line-numbering family
Valve list with fail position and actuator type for the EI&T scope
SIS register per IEC 61511 separated from BPCS
Revision comparison reports for IFC-to-IFD-to-AFC progression

Operator-specific tagging conventions come through alongside ISA 5.1
Multi-page drawing sets process page-by-page so review starts on early pages while later pages are still processing
BPCS, SIS, FGS segmentation onto distinct Excel sheets
Revision comparison produces the IFC-to-AFC change records project document control needs
Direct exports to TIA Portal, Studio 5000, PLCCreator, DEXPI
Image-based ingestion covers brownfield revamp scope where prior as-builts are scanned

Start a workspace Pricing

Fluor is referenced descriptively. Tagsight has no affiliation with Fluor Corporation.